SparkyTel
27th April 2007, 04:04 PM
Hi,
Wonder if you can help me with a conundrum. Within guidance note 3 we are shown Live Zs tests for lighting cirucits where the person undertaking the tests has to remove switch covers or ceiling roses so working near exposed live conductors.
Surely this is in conflict with regulation 14 of the Electricity at Work Regulations, which basicly require Live Working to be avoided if it can be reasonably done dead.
Obviously it is quite reasonable to do a R1+R2 reading while the installation is dead and add this to Ze to give us Zs - so should the IEE change its guidance when it releases the 17th?
Your thoughts, pros and cons regarding Initial Verification Vs Periodic would be most interesting to hear!
Regards
tel
Wonder if you can help me with a conundrum. Within guidance note 3 we are shown Live Zs tests for lighting cirucits where the person undertaking the tests has to remove switch covers or ceiling roses so working near exposed live conductors.
Surely this is in conflict with regulation 14 of the Electricity at Work Regulations, which basicly require Live Working to be avoided if it can be reasonably done dead.
Obviously it is quite reasonable to do a R1+R2 reading while the installation is dead and add this to Ze to give us Zs - so should the IEE change its guidance when it releases the 17th?
Your thoughts, pros and cons regarding Initial Verification Vs Periodic would be most interesting to hear!
Regards
tel